Nigerian-born American rapper Ms Jorji has sparked controversy after making provocative comments about dating, sex, money and reproduction during an appearance on the Honest Bunch Podcast.
The rapper said she expects financial benefits and sexual satisfaction from men, arguing that women who set financial requirements for potential partners are also engaging in transactional relationships.
Speaking about what she wants from men, Ms Jorji said: I know what I want out of life, what I want from men is d+ck and money, simple.
She further argued that men should not expect sexual access to women without offering something in return, insisting that some men feel overly entitled to intimacy.
No man should touch me for free, that’s disgusting. I am hot and most men want to sleep with me, so why would I give it for free? It doesn’t work like that. One of the issues we have is that men get entitled, she said.
The rapper also challenged women who reject the label of transactional relationships while insisting that prospective male partners must meet certain financial or material expectations before dating or having sex with them.
According to her, requirements such as owning a car, having a house and holding a job amount to an exchange of benefits, even when money is not directly offered for sex.
Women are prop%stitutes all. You meet women who say, ‘Oh, I don’t have s+x for money.’ Okay, but he has to have a car. He has to have his place. He has to have a job. He has to have this. That’s quid pro quo. You have standards on what you want before you give,” Ms Jorji said.
She questioned why women who consider themselves different from those who exchange sex for money would not consider relationships with homeless men.
“I’ve asked women, why don’t you sleep with homeless men when you’re horny outside? If you believe that you’re better than me, I need to see more homeless men getting co%chie,” she added.
Her comments present her personal view of dating and sexual relationships, although financial expectations and personal standards do not automatically mean that every relationship is transactional.
Ms Jorji also drew attention with remarks about reproduction and men with micropenises, suggesting that not everyone should reproduce.
“Men with microp+nises are being, are supposed to be eradicated,” she said, arguing that nature was attempting to eliminate them through natural selection.
Identifying herself as a dominatrix, the rapper claimed that she regularly encountered men with micropenises and expressed the view that they should not exist.
She also described such men as particularly loud and annoying, comments likely to attract further criticism over body-shaming and her remarks about human reproduction.
Micropenis is a recognised medical condition involving an unusually small penis, and it does not determine a person’s worth, character or suitability for relationships. The condition also does not, by itself, mean that someone should be excluded from reproduction.
Ms Jorji’s statements have brought renewed attention to debates about money, sex, gender expectations and the role of financial stability in modern relationships.
Her remarks challenge conventional expectations about dating while raising questions about the difference between personal preferences, mutually agreed arrangements and relationships in which intimacy is explicitly exchanged for financial benefits.
The rapper’s comments reflect her stated personal opinions and should not be taken as evidence that all women view relationships in the same way.
The discussion also highlights the sensitivity surrounding comments about physical characteristics, particularly when they are linked to claims about who should or should not reproduce.
